The NCL Sky just sent notices out to booked passengers for the Apr 26 9 Day Cruise to the Caribbean that the itinerary has changed. Two ports were reversed, but 8 hours were cut out of the port visits which only totaled 57.5 hours in the first place. If the result of the sustainability is to reduce the carbon foot print, then the fuel ($$$) savings should be returned to the guests who are burdened by this change. I understand changes due to weather, and political strife, but sustainability issues which are goaled for 2050 do not have to be thrust upon customers who have already booked a cruise. Or at least, make the changes during the period prior to the 120 day cutoff. Then I would have the choice to accept the change or move to a different cruise or cruise line. This is NOT a way to treat your income sources.
